Advertisement
About Phillyist

Phillyist is a website about Philadelphia. More

Editors: Angela DiOrio, Jillian Ashley Blair Ivey
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertise | Archive | Mobile | Publicity | RSS | Send Tips | Staff

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

<a href="http://www.phillyblog.com/philly/queen-village-bella-vista-hawthorne/70968-strange-lost- [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Phillyist.
Join Us
WriteForPhillyist1.jpg
Want to write for Phillyist?

Click here to find out how!

Image via thebigdurian
Ask Phillyist
questionblock.jpg
Got a question?

Ask us!

If we don't know the answer, surely one of our readers will.

(Image Source)
The Giveaway
Speak Out
The Interview
Photoist
The latest photo:
Frosty & Elmo
Submit your own
Public Calendar
Links

June 9, 2008

BSL (With Extra Emphasis on the "BS")

Does this Pit Bull look harmful to you?  We didn't think so.Have you been in Rittenhouse Square on a nice Saturday afternoon lately? If so, you've probably seen volunteers from the Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) out with some of their adoptable pets. If you've seen the PAWS folks out and about, or if you've checked our recent profiles of PAWS dogs, you may have noticed that many of these shelter dogs are Pit Bull mixes, and that they're complete sweethearts.

Unfortunately, Pit Bulls get a bad rap. But it's really through no fault of the dogs' own. The negative feelings a lot of people harbor towards Pit Bulls (plus some other breeds, notably Rottweilers) should be pointed at the irresponsible, and occasionally outright cruel, "people" who own them. Thanks to the Michael Vick debacle, stories of dogfighting—mostly involving Pit Bulls—have been in and out of the media over the last several months. Heap that on top of the occasional dog bite stories, which also frequently involve Pit Bulls or Rottweilers, and you have a recipe for people to naively, if perhaps understandably, believe that there is something inherently aggressive, even evil, about these breeds.

But here's the thing. There's nothing wrong with Pit Bulls or Rotties. These breeds are loyal, intelligent, and highly trainable. And therein lies the twist. Under the watch of the wrong owner, these smart, eager-to-please canines can be trained to be aggressive. But they can also trained to be loving companions who won't hurt a fly. This Phillyist has encountered numerous Pit Bulls in Rittenhouse and at PAWS events over the last few months, and the only time I was ever "accosted" by one, it was because he wanted to give kisses.

So, given the sweet, loving disposition of the Pits that we've encountered, the hair on the back of our neck stands up when we hear about breed-specific legislation (BSL), which nearly always targets Pit Bulls. BSL generally comes in the form of municipal ordinances prohibiting the ownership of certain dog breeds, with the justification being that the breeds in question are somehow more dangerous or aggressive than other types of dogs. (We're resisting the urge to get into a rant about the dubious constitutionality of these laws, but suffice it to say, it doesn't strike us as particularly proper that a person can be prohibited from keeping their pet without some kind of proof that that particular animal is dangerous.)

Essentially, BSL considers every individual dog to embody the worst characteristics of its breed stereotypes. Think that's a good idea? Great, let's enact laws applicable to human beings that way and see how that goes over. Yes, we know that such laws are forbidden by the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, but even leaving that aside, just imagine how such laws would go over in today's court of popular opinion.

Fortunately, Pennsylvania law currently prohibits municipalities from enacting BSL. However, a bill currently pending in the Pennsylvania legislature, which is before the House Agricultural and Rural Affairs Committee, would lift the ban on local BSLs. The bill is opposed by the American Kennel Club, PAWS, and anyone who has ever known and loved a "suspect" breed. Here's what Tara Derby, CEO of the Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association (the city organization for which PAWS acts as the adoption subdivision), said to Phillyist about BSL:

There is no evidence that breed specific legislation produces any positive outcome in communities across the nation that have enacted laws restricting certain breeds of dogs. Instead, what we are beginning to see in communities with breed specific legislation are its detrimental and heartbreaking effects: mandatory relinquishment of beloved pets, increased intake in already overburdened animal shelters and in turn, the unnecessary euthanasia of healthy shelter animals.

We're baffled by the fact that there are people out there who actually think BSL is a good idea. Its proponents have chosen to regulate otherwise harmless animals because they are unwilling or unable to allocate the responsibility where it properly lies: with owners who neglect or mistreat their animals. So what can you do? Encourage the Pennsylvania legislature not to pass the bill lifting the ban on BSL, House Bill 2553. Please follow the link to the American Kennel Club's statement on BSL above, which contains the contact info for the Pennsylvania committee members currently considering the bill. Also, take a moment to fill out this petition, or this one, against BSL. We wouldn't make laws about man this way; there's no reason we should do it to man's best friend.

Image via Flickr user coral11.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Phillyist Continues Below!

Comments (8) [rss]

Exceptional article!
Just plain commonsense.
I don`t live in your State or even your Country but I will sign the petition anyway.
I live in a large area that has BSL which targets the 3 Pure Breeds normally targeted by BSL
1)Staffordshire Bull Terrier
2)American Staffordshire Bull Terrier and
3)APBT and that 4th vague Category
a dog that has an appearance and physical characteristics that are substantially similar to those 3 dogs.
There are upwards of 20+ Breeds that may fall under that as well as hundreds of thousands of Mutts.

It`s ludicrous to say the least.

If Politicians are not going to start listening to Canine Experts and Organizations and listening to what Courts are telling them ie Tack vs Alabama
"No Dog is inherently vicious simply due to it`s breed"
then I say it`s time for responsible "Pit Bull" owners to take a stand and say that they are simply not going to comply and each and every person needs to fight for their dog in court.

Officials insist on slaughtering innocent pets and prosecuting owners who have done nothing wrong but own one of these dogs, but when a charge should be laid against an owner they back down.

Case in point..
Couple of days ago a 2 year old wandered near a chained Pit Bull in his father`s yard and was severely attacked.
The dog wasn`t registered,licensed or microchipped as required.Officials hadn`t known this dog even existed.
Father admits it wasn`t a pet.It was trained to be vicious and to be a guard dog.
Police and officials debated a few days whether to lay charges and today decided not to.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200806100542/1fbd7af3
What the hell-o?
But if I was to just have a banned breed as a great house pet that likes to lie on the couch,get belly rubs and perhaps had it`s Therapy dog designation,I would be charged for owning a banned dog.

Does that make sense to anyone?
Of course that father should be charged and he should be banned from owning any dog until he can prove that he is a responsible pet owners.
Responsible dog owners don`t train their dogs to be vicious guard dogs that they keep chained.

Now this father is free to get another dog and do the exact same thing again which will further tarnish the reputation of "Pit Bulls".
This is exactly the type of person who should not own one of these dogs.
"Pit Bulls" love people and they are meant to be house pets and best friends not guard dogs.

 

Like I said in previous post,there was nothing to stop that father from getting another dog...
well he didn`t wait long.
He`s got another one.
http://www.tv3.co.nz/News/NationalNews/VeterinaryAssociationwantsGovttorethinksomeofitsdoglaws/tabid/184/articleID/58895/cat/64/Default.aspx

I wonder how long before this dog attacks, after this guy trains it to be vicious and keeps it chained up?

 

Thanks for your thoughts, Pibble. When a person tells another person to harm somebody—or to kill somebody—he's looking at some serious charges being lad against him. Why the owners of animals can't be held to this same standard, I'll never understand.

 

I really enjoyed your article and so appreciate the education that you provide to those who don't understand BSL and how terrible it is. I especially appreciate that you ended your article with actual things that people can do to help this situation because we certainly do need people to step forward and speak out on behalf of those who do not have a voice.

There is only one thing that I would ask that you might consider modifying in the article: "And therein lies the twist. Under the watch of the wrong owner, these smart, eager-to-please canines can be trained to be aggressive. But they can also trained to be loving companions who won't hurt a fly."

I also believe that they are easily trained and that's one of the reasons I choose them as my service dogs, however, I disagree with the idea that they are easily trained to be aggressive. My current service dog came to me at a year old with numerous fears and phobias because they had worked to make her a street fighter and found that she would not cooperate with them. They were able to terrify her of many simple things - rain, skateboards, fly swatters, etc. would send her crashing into my legs as she tried to "escape" from these scary things. Fortunately, I was able to ease her fears and find methods to calm her and reassure her that not only did I need her to take care of me, but I was also in her life to take care of her. Now, she's a brave, 3-year old and I love seeing her able to explore areas and things that would have been too frightening for her previously.

It is difficult to "train" these dogs to be DEADLY aggressive - it's the incredibly unfortunate canines who, because of their physical traits, are taken by 2-legged monsters and beaten with chains, tortured with water thinking they are being drowned, given electrical shocks over and over (trying to comprehend what they have done wrong and how they can stop the torture), they are shot full of drugs that alter their personalities and make them insanely thirsty and hungry, and every step of the way, the humans they look to for love and companionship are urging them to fight, fight, kill, kill, kill - that being the only time they hear one word of praise. These horrible crimes start with the 2-legged monsters who completely destroy the personalities of these dogs who have been valued as canine clowns, loyal nannies, heroes, gentle giants who love kittens and are known for their ready smiles.

It's not easy to train them to be deadly aggressive, but it is intentional - no one "accidentally" creates a dangerous pit bull type dog. It starts with a dangerous 2-legged monster.

Respectfully submitted,
Shauna Russ

 

Well written article. I am a proud owner of a rescued APBT. She has her Canine Good Citizen certificate and is active in competitive obedience and agility. She has changed the minds of many "pitbull" fearing people. I have my letters sent to the PA Representatives and encourage everyone to do the same.

 

Shauna, your point is well-taken. Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "trained" into aggressiveness. More like tortured into it. But I think we may be talking about a distinction without a difference with regard to our choice of words, and I'm pretty sure we're on the same page with our feelings about Pits and BSL.

 

Responsibility for ones own actions speaks volumes`~ that of course makes to much sense

 

And if anyone still has any lingering doubts about why we cringe at the idea of BSL, and why pit bulls should be saved, check out this story from MSNBC about one of the pit bulls saved from Michael Vick's dogfighting compound.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter