http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php All comments for Proofreading Philly en-us 2009 MikeMuller Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:15:29 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss redmullersox@yahoo.com redmullersox@yahoo.com 60 http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1292044 http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1292044 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:46:27 -0500 <p>Haha, no worries! Glad to see a like-minded reader!</p> http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1292025 http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1292025 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:27:05 -0500 <p>oops... didn't notice the comment at the bottom of the post about Bill & Ted.</p> http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1291988 http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1291988 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:10:31 -0500 <p>Maybe they meant it like: Person: "You all don't have donuts!" All: "We soooooo do have donuts."</p> http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1291975 http://phillyist.com/2008/02/14/proofreading_ph_50.php#comment-1291975 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:43 -0500 <p>What can you expect from a business that feels the need to tell you their donuts are friendly. "Excuse me, are your donuts friendy?" "I'm sorry, sir, but no. We only carry the aggressive varieties, here."</p>