<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Phillyist: Proofreading Philly</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php</link>
<description>All comments for Proofreading Philly</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 MikeMuller</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:15:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>redmullersox@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>redmullersox@yahoo.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>matty</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1075611</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1075611</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:21:59 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;seems like compellation is an archaic word though. but what do i knough?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>matty</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1075609</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1075609</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:21:24 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;asian mike, ftw. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>as</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073801</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073801</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:38:46 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t know, that would be an extremely rare (and possibly archaic) usage if so, and the formulation &quot;...of players gathered from available records&quot; suggests they were really looking for &quot;compilation.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Asian Mike</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073606</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073606</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:37:20 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it might be ok though. A compellation is an act of addressing names. I&apos;m not sure about the plural structure though.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sk</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073503</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073503</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:51:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The extreme nitpicker in me wants to point out, also: Shouldn&apos;t it be &quot;omissions or errors&quot;?  Don&apos;t they both need to be plural, in order to be in parallel structure?  

But, as Gail pointed out, they&apos;re not taking responsibility for it anway.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gail</title>
<link>http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073485</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phillyist.com/2007/04/24/proofreading_ph_13.php#comment-1073485</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:32:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It clearly states they apologize for any errors.  Don&apos;t they get credit for carving a discalimer in granite as well?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>