Advertisement
About Phillyist

Phillyist is a website about Philadelphia. More

Editors: Angela DiOrio, Jillian Ashley Blair Ivey
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertise | Archive | Mobile | Publicity | RSS | Send Tips | Staff

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

Any word on Save the Library rallies today, Wed Nov. 19th? [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments

Karina on PAWS Dog of the Week

Andrew Johnston on The Nightwatchman to Take Up Post at the Factory

Jillian Ashley Blair Ivey on Yo, Philly in the News

Jillian Ashley Blair Ivey on Philadelphia Weirdness

Pat Holston on Yo, Philly in the News

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Phillyist.
Join Us
WriteForPhillyist1.jpg
Want to write for Phillyist?

Click here to find out how!

Image via thebigdurian
Ask Phillyist
questionblock.jpg
Got a question?

Ask us!

If we don't know the answer, surely one of our readers will.

(Image Source)
The Giveaway
Speak Out
The Interview
Photoist
The latest photo:
photoist
Submit your own
Public Calendar
Links

March 1, 2006

Pajama Crisis, But Not the Band

PJs.jpgA Phillyist reader sent us an email discussing a growing problem in Philadelphia street style:

Dear Phillyist Style Guru (ed. note – “guru?” Flattery will get you EVERYWHERE, Joanna): Please tell me that I’m not turning into some crazy crotchety old lady. I can’t be the only one who thinks that wearing pajama bottoms out in public should NOT BE DONE.

While I dig Old Navy for their reasonable pricing and wide range of sizes, I hate them for what they have let loose on the streets. Any thoughts on when this fad will die?

Thanks,
Joanna

Joanna, you may, in fact, be turning into a crazy, crotchety old lady. Phillyist can not comment on that. However, what we can say is that on the pajama pants issue, we support you in your cause 100%.

Phillyist distinctly believes that certain clothes were created for certain purposes. Pajama bottoms definitely fall into this group. We also will extend this to work-out wear. No matter what some would have you believe, there is no reason for sweats and other work-out gear to be worn unless you are a) in a gym, b) on your way to or from a gym, or c) sitting on your sofa and not actually expecting to be seen by anyone.

Yes, we mean the sweat pants, the track suits, the bike shorts, the leotards -- these were created for exercising. They are functional, not fashionable clothes. They were not created for style, and therefore for the most part they’re horrifyingly unflattering. And, especially on men, they can be more… shall we say… “revealing” than most of us are comfortable with.

Looping back around to our main point, pajama bottoms are similarly functional items. No matter how cute the print (Phillyist is currently wearing ones with skulls on them!), the fact remains that they were created for the purpose of comfort and relaxation. Wearing them outdoors says of a person “I’m so lazy, I couldn’t be bothered to actually dress today!”

So yes, Joanna, we do agree, and while we cannot guess at when the fad will peter out, we can join you in hoping that it will be soon.

Feel free to write in your own style gripes and raves.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: Phillyist Continues Below!

Comments (5)

Oh my god, I hate the sweatpants in public! HATE!

 

It's comforting to know I'm not alone :)

 

I hate to be the voice of dissention (ok, I don't really hate it), but I quite wish pajamas *were* acceptable in public. In fact, I often mourn the fact that they are not.

 

I think that the pajama bottom/gym wear issue is particularly bad in West Philly, as we have so many college kids here...While I understand the reasons why people want to wear them out of the house (comfort, mostly), they just aren't flattering at all. Also, really cute pj bottoms take the attention off of the person wearing them...you only really focus on the cute skulls, in the Phillyist's case...

glad to have you back, btw.

 

You think this is bad, you should come to China, where the PJ prints are horrendous (cute and scary) and ubiquitous!!! Ask the people at Shanghaiist.com

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter